This is the sixth of my
review reports on COVID-19 worldwide as at August 20th 2021. This
report will cover deaths per case; calculable for all 191 reporting countries.
And it is a good method, by which to judge a country’s performance against the
virus. For a high deaths per case ratio may indicate a failure to find and
record a significant fraction of the cases which have occurred; or a poor
quality of treatment within the healthcare system; or both.
Europe
I’ll start, as before, in Europe. I’ll show two graphs for
each group of countries. First, cumulative deaths per case as measured over the
course of the epidemic. And second, the actual deaths per case ratios, with the
numbers of cases always offset by 21 days, which is the mean length of time
between a case being reported, and death supervening (if it does). At the end,
I’ll show ordered lists of the percentage of cumulative deaths per case, and of
the current deaths per case ratios among all the countries in the region.
The first graph shows convergence towards a roughly constant total of deaths per case for most countries (though the UK, and one or two others, have decreased). The second shows the peaks and troughs since October 2020; each peak maybe representing a new variant.
Here, in several of the countries, after the first trough the deaths per case have increased; particularly in Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. The cumulative deaths per case to date are both generally higher, and further apart from each other, than in countries to the west.
Here, the cumulative deaths per case are even wider spread, with Bosnia and Herzegovina at the top, and Cyprus as a significant outlier at the bottom.
In this group of mostly small countries, cumulative deaths per case to date are even lower than in most of the countries than in the other groups. They are all below 2%!
So, here is the ordered list of European countries by
cumulative deaths per case:
All the countries near the top, except Italy, are in Eastern Europe. I’ll add Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Italy, to my list of countries deserving follow-up for their poor performance. For the other end of the scale, I’ll add Cyprus, Denmark and Finland. And the UK and Ireland, because of their significant recent improvements in cumulative deaths per case.
Here is the ordered list of current deaths per case in
Europe:
There’s a strong east-to-west gradient in this list. And most of the major West and North European countries are near the bottom of the list. Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland are all Nordic countries; and Estonia is all but. Of the major non-Nordic countries, Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland, the UK, Cyprus, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal and France are all under 0.5%.
I’ll add North Macedonia to my follow-up list; that 35%
ratio of current deaths per case is amazingly bad!
Americas
As I don’t find the deaths per case spaghetti graphs
particularly informative, I’ll only show the cumulative deaths per case here
(except for North/Central America). I’ll show the deaths per case (with a 21-day
offset) in the report on the individual countries I pick for further study.
This looks much like Western Europe, except for the enormously high outlier of Mexico. Because of this outlier, I’ll show the deaths per case over time graph for this area:
Mexico (dark blue) has been way above the rest almost all the time since the very first wave!
A big spread; and big trouble in Peru and Ecuador. Venezuela is at the bottom; given the rĂ©gime, I don’t believe that. I think they deserve to go on the “probable naughty boys” list!
In general, much like Eastern Europe, or South America except for Peru and Ecuador.
The top three in this list are all on my list for further follow-up. As is Grenada near the bottom, and (now) Venezuela, whose figures trigger my bullshit meter, just as Nicaragua’s and Egypt’s did in earlier reports.
Jamaica is worth adding to the follow-up list. Cuba, too:
are their figures believable?
Middle East and North Africa
A wide spread, but comparable with other places; except for Syria, which is a war zone.
Except for Yemen, which is another war zone and excluded from the above graph altogether, there are far lower deaths per case here; these countries must be doing something right! Saudi Arabia is an outlier.
Comparable with other countries, except for Sudan and Egypt; both of which have had their problems in recent years.
Sudan deserves a closer look. So would Egypt, if I could believe its figures; but as I told in the previous report, I can’t do that. Qatar and Bahrain at the bottom are also worth another look.
Sub-Saharan Africa
These figures seem low in comparison to other countries, even to Western Europe. Not only does the virus seem to spread less easily in Central Africa than elsewhere; but it also seems to be less lethal per case.
Somalia is the high outlier; another war zone. Burundi, the Seychelles and Eritrea are low outliers. Otherwise, these figures are comparable with norms in other countries.
Here, Mauritius is the low outlier, and Zimbabwe the high one.
Not much to see here, except the recent upward trend in Guinea, which doesn’t look good.
Tanzania deserves another look, because its deaths per million are very low, yet its cumulative deaths per case are the second highest in Africa.
Rest of Asia
That weird figure for current deaths per case in Kazakhstan comes from an enormous
negative adjustment (more than 59,000) in the number of new cases on July 24th,
which caused the weekly averaged number of cases for the week centred on July
27th to go negative! At the other end of the table, Vietnam is worth
adding to the list.
Australasia and Oceania
Top and bottom 20
Here are the lists of the top and bottom 20 countries in
cumulative deaths per case:
Recent improvements in deaths per case
For deaths per case, I’ve done some calculations, like those I
did for hospital and ICU occupancy per case in the fourth report of this set.
For 32 countries which supplied data on hospital or ICU occupancy, I compared
deaths per case (21-day offset) as at August 20th with the same
figure six months previously, on February 20th. I calculated the
ratio of deaths per new case now to the deaths per new case six months ago for each
of these countries, then grouped the countries by this ratio, with the
following results:
0%: Iceland (which had no deaths around either of the
dates).
1-9%: Denmark, Ireland.
10-19%: Austria, Estonia, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, UK.
20-29%: Belgium, Hungary, Luxembourg, Slovakia, Sweden.
30-39%: France, Israel, Italy, Switzerland.
40-49%: Croatia, Czechia, Spain.
50-74%: Finland, Portugal, Poland.
75-99%: Cyprus, Lithuania, USA.
100-199%: Bulgaria, Canada, Latvia, Romania, Slovenia.
It seems that Nordic countries, and countries close to the
core of Western Europe, have done best. The USA has not improved much in deaths
per case over the course of six months, and Canada has got worse. In Eastern
Europe, the northern countries have tended to do better than the southern ones.
The follow-up list
So, here’s the list of countries I plan to follow up on in a
later report. It is culled from this report and the previous one.
Country |
Reason |
Peru |
Highest
deaths per million: Highest average excess mortality: Highest cumulative
deaths per case |
Hungary |
High deaths
per million |
Brazil |
High deaths
per million |
Bhutan |
Low deaths
per million |
Singapore |
Low deaths
per million: Lowest cumulative deaths per case |
Grenada |
Low deaths
per million: Low cumulative deaths per case |
Georgia |
Highest
current daily deaths per million |
Fiji |
High current
daily deaths per million |
Sri Lanka |
High current
daily deaths per million: High cumulative deaths per case |
Cuba |
High current
daily deaths per million: Figures may be suspect |
Ecuador |
High average
excess mortality: High cumulative deaths per case |
Mexico |
High average
excess mortality: High cumulative deaths per case |
Norway |
Lowest
average excess mortality: Nordic |
Iceland |
Low average
excess mortality: Low current excess mortality: Nordic |
Finland |
Low average
excess mortality: Low cumulative deaths per case: Nordic |
Denmark |
Low average
excess mortality: Low cumulative deaths per case: Nordic |
Sweden |
Low average
excess mortality: Nordic |
Japan |
Low average
excess mortality |
Hong Kong |
Low average
excess mortality |
Oman |
Highest
current excess mortality |
Colombia |
High current
excess mortality |
Liechtenstein |
Lowest
current excess mortality |
Cyprus |
Low current
excess mortality: Low cumulative deaths per case: Low current deaths per case |
Switzerland |
Low current
excess mortality: Low current deaths per case |
Bosnia and
Herzegovina |
Highest
cumulative deaths per case in region |
Italy |
Highest
cumulative deaths per case in core of Europe |
UK |
Significant
recent improvement in cumulative deaths per case: Low current deaths per case |
Ireland |
Significant
recent improvement in cumulative deaths per case |
North
Macedonia |
High current
deaths per case |
Venezuela |
Low
cumulative deaths per case: Figures may be suspect |
Jamaica |
Highest
current deaths per case in region |
Cuba |
Low current
deaths per case: Figures may be suspect? |
Sudan |
High current
deaths per case |
Qatar |
Low current
deaths per case |
Bahrain |
Low current
deaths per case |
Tanzania |
High deaths
per case for the region: Figures may be suspect |
Taiwan |
Highest cumulative
deaths per case in region |
Sri Lanka |
High
cumulative deaths per case for region |
Laos |
Low
cumulative deaths per case |
Vietnam |
High current
deaths per case |
That’s 40 countries to be followed up in detail; more than a fifth of the 191. To this list, I’ll add any more countries which I find are worth another look because of their record on testing or lockdowns. My plan now is to report on the testing and lockdown data first, then to follow up on all the individual countries in a final report. That will also give me the opportunity to update the countries in my list with another month or so of data.
No comments:
Post a Comment